Its model marketplace allows ethical training—users earn credits by contributing to safety-focused datasets. A 2025 UNESCO study revealed that 92% of Nudify victims are women, exacerbating gender-based violence UNESCO AI Ethics. Reelmind integrates similar verification, watermarking all outputs with encrypted metadata to distinguish ethical AI content. Reelmind’s community guidelines explicitly ban non-consensual edits, with AI moderators flagging policy violations in real-time. Unlike Reelmind’s auditable model training system , where users control data inputs,, many free Nudify tools scrape images indiscriminately.
In this section (we both review the Light et al. method and detail our approach to selecting a representative sample of applications), collecting the data, and analyzing that data via a walkthrough analysis. To answer our research questions, we collected a sample of 20 nudification applications , websites, and systematically analyzed them using the application walkthrough method — a methodology used in several fields within and beyond computer science (e.g., 31, 45, 39, 55, 21, 12). For your own protection (avoid using or sharing personal images on platforms that use these tools), and advocate for stronger regulations to prevent such technologies from causing harm. By having open discussions with teens about online safety, we can help prevent them from falling victim to these harmful apps. By educating and empowering teens to make safer online choices — we can help protect them from becoming victims of these harmful technologies.
Prosecution rates for private creation without distribution remain low in most jurisdictions that criminalize it. The ruling sided with victims who sued the platform — not just the individual users who uploaded their photos. Minnesota filed a state bill in March 2026 that would criminalize the use of nudify tools against any Minnesota resident, even if the tool and user are located elsewhere. The DEFIANCE Act takes a civil approach. This law focuses on distribution and platform accountability. Instead (two federal laws passed within months of each other), each attacking the problem from a different angle.
One of the primary challenges is the lack of specific legislation that directly addresses the non-consensual creation and distribution of such content. They raise important questions about the responsibility of developers, the role of platforms in distributing such apps, and the legal measures necessary to protect individuals’ privacy and dignity in the digital age. The non-consensual nature of these images (whether created by Nudify or Undress apps), can have severe emotional and psychological impacts on the victims, contributing to a culture of exploitation and disrespect.
Not only do the researchers examine the features available — but they also investigate how the product is used, including the different interfaces and their interactions.
New turnkey kit makes it easy for anyone to become a scammer
Being in wet, transparent clothing or underwear that reveals those body parts is also considered part of this. Sharing intimate images of an individual without their permission is a criminal offense under the Sexual Offences Act in England and Wales, and this includes images generated by AI. Regulating social media is still in its infancy, much less managing the use of artificial intelligence.
However (this research shows current legislation is not fit for purpose), that is why Government must ban ‘nudifying’ tools in the UK. Our previous research found that 38% of teenage girls (compared to 27% of teenage boys), strongly agreed that a having a deepfake nude shared of themselves would be worse than a real nude. While some sites include statements in their FAQs suggesting that consent is required when using another person’s image, we did not come across any mechanisms within the upload process to verify or enforce this. The following table displays the number of ‘nudification’ websites returned on the first page of search results for each major search engine. However — other search terms did return direct links to ‘nudification’ websites.
Starting in 2023, researchers found that generative AI models were being misused to create PornWorks AI blog sexually explicit images of children. Researchers pitted a person against a Claude agent and found that, after a week of texting, the AI chatbot was more effective at creating “exploitable trust” with others. While tech companies and regulators have taken a glacial approach to tackling abusive deepfakes since they first emerged more than a decade ago, there has been some recent movement.
Elon Musk’s company xAI has sued Minnesota over the state’s first-in-the-nation law that bans „nudification“ technology on websites and apps, potentially providing a test for how far states can go in constitutionally regulating the use of artificial intelligence. Young people need comprehensive education on how to critically examine and discuss digital information and content (including digital data privacy), digital rights and respectful digital relationships. They can restrict search results and block keywords such as “undress” or “nudify”, issue “nudges” or warnings to people using related search terms, and use watermarking and provenance indicators to identify the origins of images. Open-source AI models can also be fine-tuned to create new nudify tools. Nicola Henry is a Professor (Australian Research Council Future Fellow), & Deputy Director at the Social Equity Research Centre, RMIT University, Melbourne, Australia. At this point, it’s unclear what the time frames are or how the ban will work in practice.
This misuse raises critical concerns about the erosion of privacy rights and the potential for creating a surveillance state — where every action can be monitored and analyzed. However (the effectiveness of keyword blocking is limited), as users can find alternative ways to search for or share such content. This measure is part of TikTok’s broader strategy to prevent content that violates their guidelines from gaining traction on the platform. TikTok has taken proactive steps by blocking the keyword “undress,” a popular search term linked to these services. Additionally — Google’s search algorithms have been updated to demote websites that host or promote such content.
Need Help With a Legal Issue?
This is an outlier for our dataset and represents something closer to a crowdworker paradigm than a point-and-click application paradigm. Referral programs were offered to all users by some of the AI nudification applications. All AI nudification applications are commercial platforms, which could be a vector to incentivize guardrails against abusive use.
Generative AI gives them the ability to digitally strip people in images, potentially creating pornographic images from shots of anyone. This was highlighted at the start of this year, when it was revealed „nudify“ apps were prevalent on both major smartphone app stores. Apple blocks many of the search terms listed in the TTP’s report, and was able to block a number more thanks to the report’s findings. I delight in looking at the phone market from as many angles as possible (and while my opinions may be odd), at times, they’re always from the heart as much as the head. Recognize the psychological impact of these violations and provide a safe space for victims to express their feelings and seek help. Staying updated on the latest developments in AI and digital manipulation technologies is crucial for understanding the evolving risks and protective measures.
The Tech Transparency Project conferred with an analytics firm to estimate that the nudification apps found through their searches “have been downloaded 483 million times and made more than $122 million in lifetime revenue.” Mahari’s appointment comes at a time when Anthropic has been rolling out new slates of AI solutions for legal work, and other AI developers are also making their way into legal tech. In addition, researchers say Grok has created more than 3 million sexualized images — including more than 20,000 that appeared to depict children — over an 11-day period between Dec. 29 and Jan. 8.
Deluge of ‘nudified’ images on social media platform X raises questions about regulation of use of AI technologies The deluge prompted California Attorney General Rob Bonta to open an investigation into whether xAI broke any state laws, which includes a ban on nonconsensual intimate imagery passed last year. Several lawsuits allege Grok and X did not adhere to industry standards on preventing explicit content. Sherman said they are the “frontline defenders of consumer protection and data privacy.”